Free tools

Free Readability Checker

Analyze your content readability with Flesch Reading Ease scores, grade level analysis, and actionable recommendations.

Copy-paste outputs

Win high-intent buyers from ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and AI Overviews before your competitors do.

One operating layer for monitoring, measurement, content action, and technical cleanup.

AI Visibility TrackingCompetitive RankingSentiment by ModelSource CitationsAI Overviews TrackingPrompt MonitoringAI Visibility TrackingCompetitive RankingSentiment by ModelSource CitationsAI Overviews TrackingPrompt Monitoring
Content GapsAI InsightsAdvanced AnalyticsData CopilotBlog GenerationUGC CampaignsLLM CouncilContent GapsAI InsightsAdvanced AnalyticsData CopilotBlog GenerationUGC CampaignsLLM Council
Shopping IntelligenceCrawler MonitoringGEO OptimizationMulti-Brand ManagementShopping IntelligenceCrawler MonitoringGEO OptimizationMulti-Brand Management

Tool 01

Readability Checker

Check your content readability with Flesch-Kincaid scores, grade level analysis, and get optimization recommendations to make your content more accessible.

Text Input
Paste or type your content to check readability scores.

0 characters • 0 words

Readability Analysis
Flesch Reading Ease, grade level, and optimization recommendations.
Paste or type content to see readability analysis.

How it works

Readability Checker: methodology and worked example

How this tool computes its result

countSyllables is a heuristic: words of 3 characters or fewer count as 1 syllable; otherwise it strips a trailing "es"/"ed"/silent-e pattern and a leading "y", then counts groups of consecutive vowels (including y) via /[aeiouy]{1,2}/g. From total sentences (split on [.!?]+), total words (split on whitespace), and total syllables, it computes the Flesch Reading Ease score (206.835 − 1.015×avgWordsPerSentence − 84.6×avgSyllablesPerWord) and the separate Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (0.39×avgWordsPerSentence + 11.8×avgSyllablesPerWord − 15.59), then buckets the Reading Ease score into six ease/grade labels from "Very Easy" (≥90) down to "Very Difficult" (<30).

Worked example

Text "The cat sat on the mat. It was a sunny day." has 2 sentences and 11 whitespace-split words (avg 5.5 words/sentence), and 12 counted syllables (avg ≈1.09 syllables/word) — mostly 1-syllable short words plus "sunny" counted as 2. Flesch Reading Ease ≈ 109.0, bucketed as "Very Easy" / "5th Grade". The separate Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level formula, however, computes to about -0.6 for this same short, simple text.

When not to use this tool

The Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level output is never clamped to a sane floor — as shown above, very short or simple text can legitimately compute a negative "grade level" (e.g. -0.6), which is not a meaningful reading-grade value; the tool displays it as-is. The syllable counter is also a regex heuristic, not a phonetic dictionary, so it will miscount syllables for irregular English words.

Common mistakes

  • - Analyzing fewer than 5 sentences and treating the score as reliable — the tool itself flags this: "Add more content for a more accurate readability score" appears in the recommendations for short inputs.
  • - Feeding in content with headings, bullet lists, or code blocks and expecting sentence splitting to handle them — the tool only splits on ".", "!", and "?", so unpunctuated list items get merged into the surrounding sentence count.
  • - Applying the score to non-English content — the Flesch/Flesch-Kincaid constants (206.835, 84.6, 11.8, etc.) are calibrated for English and produce meaningless numbers on other languages.

Ready to dominate AI search visibility?

Track where your brand shows up in AI answers, close the content gaps that cost conversions, and stay visible across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Grok.

Frequently Asked Questions